<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF 
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
>
		
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.dougboude.com/blog">
	<title>Doug Boude (rhymes with &apos;loud&apos;)</title>
	<description>Powered by BlogCFM</description>
	<link>http://www.dougboude.com/blog</link>
	
	<items>
		<rdf:Seq>
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Providing-for-Service-Layer-Objects-in-CFWheels-Hello-Wirebox.cfm" />
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Providing-For-Service-Layer-Objects-in-CFWheels.cfm" />
			
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Why-Provide-for-Service-layer-objects-in-CFWheels.cfm" />
			
		</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	
	</channel>
		
  	<item rdf:about="http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Providing-for-Service-Layer-Objects-in-CFWheels-Hello-Wirebox.cfm">
	<title>Providing for Service Layer Objects in CFWheels: Hello Wirebox!</title>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot; face=&quot;Verdana&quot;&gt;This is the third and final post in a series on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Why-Provide-for-Service-layer-objects-in-CFWheels.cfm&quot;&gt;making the case for service layer objects&lt;/a&gt; (in CFWheels or any framework for that matter!), and two means of implementing them. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Providing-For-Service-Layer-Objects-in-CFWheels.cfm&quot;&gt;second post&lt;/a&gt; demonstrated</description>
	<link>http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Providing-for-Service-Layer-Objects-in-CFWheels-Hello-Wirebox.cfm</link>
	<dc:date>2012-04-18T11:50:00-05:00</dc:date>
	
	<dc:subject>OOP,Frameworks,goog,CFWheels</dc:subject>
	</item>
	
  	<item rdf:about="http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Providing-For-Service-Layer-Objects-in-CFWheels.cfm">
	<title>Providing For Service Layer Objects in CFWheels</title>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;In my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Why-Provide-for-Service-layer-objects-in-CFWheels.cfm&quot;&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt; in this series, I made the case for why I believe that service layer objects are a common need in an application&apos;s architecture. I also pointed out the fact that CFWheels does not provide for such animals within its framework, and that I had overcome this obstacle using two different approaches. What fo</description>
	<link>http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Providing-For-Service-Layer-Objects-in-CFWheels.cfm</link>
	<dc:date>2012-04-13T19:39:00-05:00</dc:date>
	
	<dc:subject>OOP,Frameworks,goog,CFWheels</dc:subject>
	</item>
	
  	<item rdf:about="http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Why-Provide-for-Service-layer-objects-in-CFWheels.cfm">
	<title>Why Provide for Service layer objects in CFWheels?</title>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It&apos;s been probably 3 months since I started using the CFWheels framework, and I have nothing but praise for it. It&apos;s a compact conventions-based framework patterned after Ruby on Rails that, once you have a grasp of the relatively simple yet complete (mostly) API, makes putting an app together a pleasure. Having come to CFWheels from other frameworks that I&apos;ve been using for a few years now (Model Glue and Coldbox primarily), I </description>
	<link>http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2012/04/Why-Provide-for-Service-layer-objects-in-CFWheels.cfm</link>
	<dc:date>2012-04-12T10:48:00-05:00</dc:date>
	
	<dc:subject>OOP,Frameworks,goog,CFWheels</dc:subject>
	</item>
	</rdf:RDF> 