Okay, I did what I try NEVER to do and that is to read a movie's reviews before I go to see it. I know, that's what ratings are for, right? To help you make an informed decision about whether or not to invest the time in a particular work. But I prefer to be completely unbiased, aside from whatever impressions the previews tended to give me, before I give myself to a new film. So I did a quick google scan of some of the reviews for "The Day the Earth Stood Still", and saw mostly negative feedback. I have to say, however, that I wonder what kind of lenses those critics used to watch this movie, because apart from what I consider to be a few minor flaws in the plot (rarely does a plot completely satisfy me), this movie was outstanding and i'd have no problem seeing it again tomorrow.

The general plot is that earth is visited by an advanced alien race (just go with it, okay?), who have come to see if it just might be possible to reason with this particular species who is threatening to ruin life for all of Earth's other inhabitants (pollution, war, giving Gore a Nobel, etc.). Well, first thing we do (under a Bush administration, anyway), is try to blow our weary space traveler to kingdom come, shooting him in the chest with small arms fire, and thus sealing the fate of human kind as we know it. The remainder of the movie is spent giving you the pieces of two parellel event lines, one that is an awesome twist on a most timeless story, and the other exploring who we are as a species. In a well planned (by the writers) series of circumstance and coincidence, our self-healed visitor is slowly but surely educated about the "other side" of mankind. Shoot, even one of their own (the only other alien in the movie) who was sent to observe us some 70 years prior consented to the fact that humans were as cuddly and lovable as they were deadly. Some compassionate, logical, teary-eyed scenes later, ET becomes convinced that humankind does indeed deserve the opportunity to evolve at the precipice of his own destruction, and intervenes to stop what would have been our certain demise.

Those scenes of emotion, compassion, logic, reasoning, and tears that I mentioned: all were very believable and flowed seamlessly together. I wish they would have had the sense to give little Mr. Smith a more masculine "do" (long dangly curls on a little boy are somewhat distracting), but the little guy still did an outstanding job in his role as the fatherless child who helps ET connect with his feminine side.

Oh, and I really REALLY loved the sci-fi that was woven in, as far as technologies, special effects (not a whole lot were needed in this particular design, but what was done was perfectly believable in the bounds of my own imagination), and what I believe were some truly original concepts. I won't give away any more of it, but what cooler way can you think of to end all traces of humanity than to create a swarm of auto-reproducing nanobots that behave like locusts and eat not just plant material, but metal, concrete, and flesh? OUTSTANDING!

Oh, one more thing you have to be mindful to do before seeing this movie: erase whatever memory or impressions you may have about the original 1951 version. Just let it go, leave it behind, pretend it was a completely different movie...which it is. Allow this contemporary version of "The Day The Earth Stood Still" to stand on its own merits and I am confident that you will be as satisfied with the investment of time and money as I was.

It was a blustery day in the Hundred Acre Woods…no, wait. It was actually a gray, cold, rainy, overcast Sunday afternoon in San Antonio. Well, cold for us south Texans, anyway. I had five of my children with me and we were looking for an economical way to entertain ourselves, so we settled on one of our “old reliables”: The Dollar Theater.

Now, I love the Dollar Theater for two reasons. The first and most obvious is that tickets to any movie only cost a dollar per person, so I can take the whole family…me, my five or six or seven children (depending on how many happen to be with me at the time), my fiancée Jen and her four kids…out to the movies for less than twenty bucks! The other reason I love the Dollar Theater is that the majority of the people who go there are Hispanic. I am 5’8, and the average Hispanic male at the Dollar Theater has got to be 5’4 or shorter, so that is the one place in town I can go and actually be looking over other men’s heads. ;)

So this past Sunday the family and I saw “Dan In Real Life”, with Steve Carell, and I have to say that it was a great piece of art. Dan is a widower with three girls, two of whom are teenagers. He’s still very much in love with his late wife and has zero social life. The movie opens with Dan and his daughters preparing for their trek to Dan’s parents’ house for the annual fall family reunion. We begin to see immediately the manifestations of the rift between a parent who cares and children who are in their “terrible teens” as the older daughter is always vying to drive the car and the middle daughter is madly in love (at least two years premature, according to her father).

Dan and the girls arrive at his parents’ home…and here’s where my attention was immediately drawn to and remained with the details of the scenes and settings until the very end of the movie. Dan’s parents live in a large, rustic home on an island in the state of Rhode Island. Dan’s two brothers and assorted children and spousal units also arrive, and everyone gets settled in to spend a long weekend together doing something somewhat rare these days: spend quality time together. Not one time does a TV set appear in this movie; not one time does anything occur in private. Even in a scene where Dan’s brother’s girlfriend is about to take a shower, Dan’s older girl remains in the bathroom, discretely turning her head, in order to continue seeking the older woman’s sage advice on a matter. None of the children are fighting, the adults plan family activities that include mental exercise (team crossword puzzle challenges, a family talent night), physical exercise (planned morning aerobics, afternoon walks as a group along the beach, football, bowling), and just “hanging out” in the living room making up songs on the piano. The parents are wise and observant, being quick to hear and slow to speak but always speaking words of wisdom to their children (especially Dan, who has fallen quite lovesick in this movie); the brothers and wives all “just get along”, even when there arises a matter that would surely become headline news down here in San Antonio (one brother killing another), the animosities don't last long and recovery quickly occurs. This movie was the illustration of what family and togetherness is supposed to be, and even though the odds are that finding such an example of family existing in the real world are not very good, I for one gave myself over to believing that it can be so, and allowed myself to be inspired by its simplicity and wholesome beauty.

I do realize that I’ve nearly completely neglected to reveal the plot of the movie with its twists, turns, and scenes that will make you laugh out loud as well as become a bit teary-eyed. The plot isn’t anything extraordinary or new, and is one that anybody over the age of 25 can likely predict with a high degree of accuracy as the movie progresses. But what I would like to convey most of all in this review is, first of all, SEE the movie…it’s well worth the time invested. Secondly, see it with your family. Watch for the nuances and “family moments” that I have pointed out, and when it’s all over, talk about it with your spouse, children, mother, brother, sister, friend…whoever watched it with you…and make it a point to adopt one or two of the old-fashioned family nuggets that the writers used to give us a refreshing glimpse of what family really can and should look like.

Doug out.